Without a doubt, one of the most popular and useful pieces of gear a photographer can own is the 70-200mm f/2.8 telephoto lens. Mode 2 is only for panning. bigger. If I apply these correction factors to the images, the distortion goes away completely. The image locks down in my finder, and I can get ultra-sharp shots hand-held at much slower speeds than I'd expect, so all is good. Section with focus distance window: metal. Check out TAMRON SP 70-200mm F/2.8 Di VC USD G2 Lens for Nikon DSLR Camera reviews, ratings, features, specifications and browse more Tamron products online at best prices on Amazon.in. But since this is a highly discussed topic online and it would potentially present problems in the "apples to apples" sharpness test coming up, I figured this would be a great first test. That was was bad way of doing that, and rendered your results null and void. Overall, and especially for the price, I'm very pleased with the image quality of the Tamron 70-200mm f/2.8 Di Macro Lens. The moment you do that, you lose image detail. I bought Nikon 70 - 200 F2.8E FL recently. Also nice pedal board line up! The Tamron SP 70-200mm F/2.8 Di VC USD G2 (A025) is a bright professional telephoto zoom with a fixed F/2.8 aperture across the entire zoom range. If you find yourself in a low light situation like shooting a wedding in a church or outside at dusk or if you are trying to take photos from a moving boat or unstable platform of some kind, VR is going to be an invaluable tool in creating the sharpest images possible. In both respects the new Tamron is a little better than the Nikon 70-200/4.0G VR. Since I have exclusively owned Nikon's version of this lens for my entire photographic career, I do have to admit I did look down on this lens a bit. Of course you have to buy what you can afford and justify but for me, long after you forget the money spent or the savings, you'll still be shooting with whatever you bought. A 77mm red filter will give darker skies with even more prominent clouds. Because so many people are going to be curious about this test, I've decided to release the actual Photoshop file I created so that you too can download it, zoom around, and come up with your own conclusions. If you deserve the best and don't worry about price, sure, get the Nikon lens. Should Photographers Cash in on the NFT CryptoArt 'Gold Rush'? It's great people like you who allow me to keep adding to this site full-time. Use a yellow filter for normal results outdoors on B&W, and I prefer the orange for stronger clouds. Free shipping on many items | Browse your favorite brands | affordable prices. With Nikon and Tamron both recently updating their version of this lens, we thought it would be a great time to review them side by side and definitively name one as the "best bang for the buck.". don't know the reason but it is worth mentioning. Compared to prior versions of the lens, the overall magnification at 200mm and around 4-5 feet was significantly worse on the Nikkor VR II. A Very Optimised Lens for Your Nikon Camera. It also offers an excellent "close-focusing-distance" minimum of just 3.1' (0.95 m) throughout its entire zoom range, with a maximum macro magnification ratio of 1:3.1 at f=200mm. For $1300 it is prob a good deal but are they actually selling for that low? The best protective filter is the 77mm Hoya multicoated HD3 UV which uses hardened glass and repels dirt and fingerprints. Stopping down, which is almost always the way we shoot macro, it gets much sharper: Kienzle Flieger Automat 800/2843, 13 April 2018. it says "ERROR". Throughout the zoom and aperture ranges, sharpness beat that of the Canon EF 70-200mm f/2.8 L IS II USM in our tests, and closely matched the Nikon AF-S 70-200mm f/2.8E FL ED VR. Please take into account the resellability, should I want to upgrade to the Nikon FL in the future. Ithink its a great lens, but I've noticed some "unsharpness", when I've got the lens in. Tamron does not seal its boxes in any way, so never buy at retail or any other source not on my personally approved list since you'll have no way of knowing if you're missing accessories, getting a defective, damaged, returned, non-USA, store demo or used lens. See Nikon 70-200/2.8s Compared for the differences between them. As you can see in the video review, this focus breathing problem becomes less and less noticeable as you move the camera further and further away. In India its about $500 cheaper after rebate. Here's a quick parfocal comparison of the Tamron vs the Nikon 70-200 f/2.8E FL. Capture high-quality professional images with this Tamron SP 70-200mm zoom lens. Just be sure to buy only from an approved source so you'll have the option of a 100% cash refund return if it just doesn't work on your camera. Check out Stop Motion Basics for Beginners: http://bit.ly/291lWYuThe new Tamron 70-200mm F/2.8 G2 lens is here! If you have seen the behind the scenes from that series then you probably know that all of the telephoto images and videos were shot using one of our three Nikon 70-200mm f/2.8 VR II lenses. Leave this at FULL, unless the lens is racking all the way in and out hunting for the subject, which you know is at least 3m/10' away. I have no idea how well using an adapter with the Canon version of this Tamron will work on Sony; you're really asking for trouble. While off-brand makers all smile and try to reassure you today that they'll be around in the future to update lenses, experience has shown that these makers just walk away when it comes to trying to update 10 year old lenses. You can really see this in the corners and pretty much on every small piece of text. Photos without this requirement will be deleted at the admin/moderator's discretion. Considering that the price of a SH Nikon VRII could be quite close to the price of a Tamron G2, which one would you chose in a direct comparison between the two? For Sony, get any of the newest Sony 70-200mm f/2.8 GM OSS, Sony 70-200mm f/4 G OSS or Sony FE 70-300mm G FE OSS lenses instead. Nikons need no lens profiles for this. Hopefully Sigma can up their game soon with a new 70-200 lens :-). Nikon D850, Tamron 70-200mm f/2.8 G2 at 70mm at f/8 at 1/250 at Auto ISO 64. bigger or camera-original © file. Nikons can correct any lens for lateral chromatic aberrations and falloff without a profile, but Canon can't correct these without a profile. From corner to corner, this lens shows the most detail out of the group. The lens is fast with a F2.8 constant aperture, which is good for indoor sports images. This could be because the VR II lens is the oldest lens of the group and the other lenses are almost brand new. Apparently when the Nikon VR II lens was released years ago, the Internet was up in arms about how poorly that lens performed near its minimum focusing distance. The niftiest part is that there are Arca-Swiss grooves in it. Thank you! Just slide the real mechanical focus ring with a fingertip. Great review! There's no need for thin filters. But this is a no brainer for anybody not "having to have" an original Nikon. I use a clear (UV) protective filter instead of a cap. Even the reviews at Amazon love it. Check out the Fstoppers Store for in-depth tutorials from some of the best instructors in the business. Made in China ("Designed in Japan"). Even though the VR II lens might be a little more sharp than either of the Tamron lenses in the center of the frame, I am going to rank this lens last because of how soft it is around the edges. This ad-free websites biggest source of support is when you use those or any of these links to approved sources when you get anything, regardless of the country in which you live. Most of the outside is plastic, and most of the insides are metal. No camera can correct it automatically because no Nikon and no Canon camera have a lens profile for this lens. Buy now & save $100. Autofocus, VR and the diaphragm don't work on my 1980s Nikon F4. You can make your own judgement for yourself. So with all that being said, to answer the question in the title of this article: Which Telephoto Lens is Best For the Money:  Tamron 70 - 200 G2, Which Telephoto Lens Is The Best Regardless of Cost:  Nikkor 70 - 200 VR FL. It's also for discussing however you are happy or not with your lens or if you haven't bought it yet you can join the discussion and ask whatever you need asking before buying. Image stabilization is extremely important when using a long lens at slower shutter speeds. We have owned the 80-200mm f/2.8 Two Ring version, the more rare 80-200mm AF-S, the first Nikkor VR I version, and now we currently own three copies of the Nikkor VR II lens. Honestly half of Nikon's current catalog of lenses won't work on half their new cameras today, so I don't know that this lens will have any more problems than any other Nikon lens. I was intrigued when Tamron asked if we would replace our trusty Nikkor lens with their own version, the Tamron 70-200mm f/2.8 Di VC SP. In the center of the frame, this lens is perhaps the second most sharp but if you look at the Ditto or the Diamond Compressor you can clearly see that both the Tamron lenses are much sharper. Reviews Just grab the genuine mechanical focus ring at any time for instant manual-focus override. Improvements to the new SP 70-200mm F/2.8 G2 extend well into the lens barrel. Marginally-reduced quality at a greatly reduced price for the after-market lenses make them a better value than name-brand glass. It's useless on my 2006 Nikon D40, which simply shows an Error. This telephoto lens, which I'm going to call the SP throughout this article, has always been around $1,200 which is a great bargain compared to the pricier Nikon versions. As mentioned above, Lee and I are primarily Nikon shooters although we are in the process of switching over to Panasonic (more articles on that soon). If you are only concerned with taking still photographs this probably isn't as big of a deal as it would be for video work but you also might wind up with a composition slightly different than what you saw when you pressed the shutter. This lens has been our main workhorse lens for weddings and portraits for over five years so it's safe to say we know this lens forwards and backwards. However, a look at the specs also reveals that it shows a considerable amount of focus breathing, an issue that is also found on the Nikon AF-S 70-200/2.8 VR II. These lenses were often not as sharp as their Nikon and Canon counterparts and the overall design and extra features almost always left a lot to be desired. If you're in perfect focus, there are no fringes. Therefore there is no correction for falloff (peripheral illumination), lateral color fringes (chromatic aberration), distortion or diffraction on any Canon camera. The marked focal lengths are correct at infinity. The included, removable metal tripod collar has Arca-Swiss grooves in it. The tripod collar is very good. ● Half the price of Canon or Nikon's similar lenses. Zobacz inne Obiektywy, najtańsze i najlepsze oferty, opinie. Basically you are just looking at how large the images appear at a specified zoom. Tamron A025N 70 - 200 mm G2 VC USD Lens for Nikon Camera - Black £1,149.00 In stock. After shooting soccer games with a rather old Sigma 70-200 f2.8 for years now, I decided to get more modern here and ordered both the Nikon VRII and the Tamron G2 (the new Nikon … As this page is copyrighted and formally registered, it is unlawful to make copies, especially in the form of printouts for personal use. 3.5" maximum diameter × 7.6" extension from flange. This Tamron is as sharp as the 80-200/2.8 AF-S, 80-200/2.8 AF-D and the other 70-200/2.8 lenses. Now if you have ever tried to conduct your own sharpness test you very well know that there are a million variables that can skew your results. This effect is minor at 70mm, and strong at 200mm. Very Nice Review of the hottest contested 2.8 zooms on market, straight to the Point! I've oned the Tamron SP 009 and used it on a Nikon D750 and D800. Kienzle Flieger Automat 800/2843, 13 April 2018. The cost difference (Nikon FL vs. Tamron G2) is not just a few bucks, it is double. Here are shots at headshot distance: Davis 6250 weather station, 17 April 2018. bigger or camera-original © file. I tried it on my 1990s Nikon F5, and it autofocuses and stabilizes just fine, but it only shoots at f/2.8. I'd pass on a used original-version Nikon 70-200/2.8 VR; it's softer than this lens at 200mm. Fluorine coating to resist dirt and smudges. Like many zooms, this Tamron lens reduces its actual focal lengths at closer focusing distances to allow it to focus more closely. $ difference is not worth the marginal quality. There are no color fringes as shot on Nikon cameras, which by default correct for any that may be there. After a few weeks filming some of the most beautiful places in the deserts of Utah and Arizona, I thought it would be interesting to conduct a thorough side-by-side comparison — a shootout if you will — of both Tamron lenses against the two most recent versions of Nikon's 70-200mm f/2.8 lens. Free and Open Versus Subscription: Can RawTherapee Develop Your Images Just as Well as Lightroom? Apparently all of the 70-200mm lenses except the new Nikon do not actually shoot at 200mm, especially if they are focused on something up close.