You signed out in another tab or window. This is significant because one of the assumptions of the confession opportunity is that those who cheated know they cheated (you either cheated or you didn't), whereas some people I talked to found themselves unsure of whether they were guilty. True, but ... good luck getting an interview if you haven't graduated with a degree in CS, arent the # of students in the class actually 548: http://osoc.berkeley.edu/OSOC/osoc?p_term=FL&x=-504&p_classif=--+Choose+a+Course+Classification+--&p_deptname=--+Choose+a+Department+Name+--&p_presuf=--+Choose+a+Course+Prefix%2fSuffix+--&y=-208&p_course=61c&p_dept=cs, Clicking on 'Click here for current enrollment information and course restrictions' should give you a current count of ppl in the class i think, New comments cannot be posted and votes cannot be cast. If you would like to discuss your grade with me, this is something I do not do by email, so arrange to see me at the beginning of the Spring semester. CS 61C: Great Ideas in Computer Architecture (Machine Structures). This piazza site will be disabled shortly. Do not use the version of Logisim preinstalled on the Soda lab computers, as this will mess up your circuits! This issue may concern students because under course policy, many students would be "cheating", so the students who get caught would be, in their eyes, simply unlucky. You signed in with another tab or window. --edited out--, New comments cannot be posted and votes cannot be cast. Maybe for the first week they would say something but eventually, students sharing answers, debugging together, browsing github together became the norm. Where did you hear that people who confessed got only some points deducted? I have seen people give their entire project to a struggling friend. I also think it's good training for working with people on a real engineering project. I hate to say it but cheaters are not punished at Berkeley, especially if this is your first infraction. At the minimum a ZERO for the assignment, possibly an F in the course, and a letter to your university record documenting the incidence of cheating. You WILL be caught, and the penalties WILL be severe. Possibly penalizing students who do so ... but admitting that there is nothing I could do after the course. The cs department is so generous for presenting me with the restitution process; but, even if … You have until Monday at noon to contact me or your teaching assistant. Note that the top level of the circuit looks almost exactly the same as our previous adder circuit, but now there’s a FSMLogic block instead of an adder block.FSMLogic is the combinational logic block for this FSM. It is not that I thought lightly of cheating; I remember every incident and every offender. Katz: I leave it up to you to disclose yourself if you did more than simply discuss. The CS and EECS communities here have always felt like a collaborative environment. It would be really interesting to see how many people got in trouble. I think the actual numbers are around 120-150 because a number of students got caught before the whole confession thing. I'm the quoted student. Previously in 61C, instead of making a mass cheating post where we offered some leniency to cheaters who confessed, we'd just directly refer people to the OSC and then make them meet up directly with the professors to explain their actions. We do try to change the assignments, but it is a huge effort to redesign them every semester. I'm assuming people just copied project code? Ok, I so was literally in the exact same situation as you. (We catch people every time we teach 61C!). False positives. For those of you unaware of the backstory for this: Part 1... http://reddit.com/r/berkeley/comments/1t15ir/some_cs61c_students_right_now, Part 2... http://www.reddit.com/r/berkeley/comments/1tag2z/cs61c_drama_part_2_shit_has_hit_the_fan/. CS 61C has 53 repositories available. We have handled the output bit for you, as it’s the most complicated to simplify and implement. Followup Reddit threads about the Fall 2013 CS61C cheating: December 20, 2013: CS61C drama part 2: shit has hit the fan, December 22, 2013: Calculated How Many Students Cheated in CS61C. kalo ada yg Kebangkitan Ertugrul episode 4 tonton online (jazakalloh khoiron Agede Bey yg udah kasih info) download via Photos. Furthermore, mark my words: the punishment acquitted to those who have not come forward will be very severe indeed. We structured our program similarly to theirs so my question is should I report myself and let the other person know as well? I won't talk about my circumstances, but i can say that the class as a whole had a culture of cheating. Keep in mind that some students might have cheated on multiple projects, so there were at least 36 cases (6.5% of the class), up to 108 (19.7% of the class). Can you elaborate on TAs turning a blind eye? So why was I so lenient? Reload to refresh your session. Good luck cheating on a CS job interview. And the TAs absolutely turned a blind eye to code sharing in the classroom. Fall 2013 CS61C Professor Randy Howard Katz posted the following note on the classroom forum on Friday, December 13, 2013: I deeply regret that I have been moved to send you this announcement. So the number is likely higher than was calculated here. I took 16A + 61A over the summer (got As) and am taking 61B right now (i luv u HUG) Hard constraints is I need to fit my R1B/R5B next semester due to some unfortunate scheduling. Most likely, you could’ve avoided cheating by starting the project earlier or prioritizing your time differently, so you constantly regret your choice. And the university's policy on cheating is pretty clear about assisting others: "Cheating is defined as fraud, deceit, or dishonesty in an academic assignment, or using or attempting to use materials, or assisting others in using materials, that are prohibited or inappropriate in the context of the academic assignment in question."